Self-assessment · Free · v2.0

Score your GTM.

Rate each sub-item from 1 (getting started) to 5 (best-in-class). Your category and overall scores update live. Nothing leaves your browser unless you ask for a review.

Overall score/50/36 answered

Before you start · Your motion

How product-led vs. sales-led is your business?

Drag the slider to set your go-to-market motion. If you run both PLG and SLG, set it somewhere in the middle (e.g. 50/50). This does two things: it hides questions that are purely about the motion you aren't using, and it weights your final score — each question's relevance to your chosen mix is multiplied by your PLG/SLG split to determine how much it contributes to your overall score.

Product-Led (PLG)Sales-Led (SLG)
50% PLG50% SLG

Why this matters

Why do you exist in the world? Who do you serve, what problem do you solve for them, and why should they choose you over the alternatives? This sounds obvious. It isn't. Most companies have some version of this written down somewhere and almost none of them have it working across the organisation. Marketing tells one version of the story. Sales tells another. The website says something different from the sales deck. The product doesn't quite match either. I've seen this in every company I've worked at and it ultimately means the company doesn't scale. In the early days you're typically selling to a passionate early adopter market who go seeking you out. They take pride in trying the cool new product but as you scale you now need to resonate with a market who are more stuck in their ways. Your story needs to unstuck them. This is the classic “crossing the chasm”… but what I've learned is that you're constantly crossing chasms and to do that your story needs to be crystal clear. The best companies have a clear and connected story from their mission statement all the way to product features. They have it verticalized. They have versions for different buyer personas. This is deep and important work.

Evidence to consider: ICP definitions, win/loss data, positioning doc, messaging hierarchy, competitive battlecards

1.1

ICP & Segmentation

What good looks like: A precise, multi-dimensional ICP that goes well beyond firmographics: it layers behavioural signals (what high-fit customers actually do in the product), needs-based criteria (the problem intensity that makes them buy), and disqualifying traits (a written anti-ICP that keeps sales and marketing from chasing poor-fit revenue). PLG and SLG customers have distinct, documented profiles because the person who swipes a credit card and the committee that signs an enterprise contract are different buyers with different journeys. The ICP is validated continuously against win/loss outcomes, churn analysis, and product usage cohorts rather than resting on founder intuition, and it is reviewed formally each quarter. Critically, it is operationalised: lead scoring, routing rules, campaign targeting, and territory design all consume the same ICP definitions, so every team is aiming at the same customer.

1Getting Started
No formally defined ICP. Target market described in broad strokes. No distinction between PLG and SLG customer profiles.
3Developing
ICP defined with firmographic data. Limited behavioural or needs-based layering. Segments inconsistently used across teams.
5Best-in-Class
Multi-dimensional ICP validated by win/loss, churn, and product usage. Distinct PLG and SLG ICPs. Reviewed quarterly.

Your score

1.2

Positioning, Messaging & Competitive Intelligence

What good looks like: A single source-of-truth positioning document cascades from mission through category, product, and down to feature-level messaging, so the website, the sales deck, the product UI, and the analyst briefing all tell one coherent story. Audience variants exist for each buyer persona and priority vertical, and every customer-facing team can find and use them. Competitive intelligence is a continuous, funded function rather than a scramble before big deals: battlecards are refreshed on a defined cadence, win/loss interviews feed them, and sellers actually use them in live deals. CI insight also flows upstream, shaping the product roadmap and the positioning itself, so the story evolves as the market does rather than fossilising.

1Getting Started
No formal positioning document. Marketing and sales tell different stories. No battlecards or systematic competitive tracking.
3Developing
Core positioning exists. Message broadly consistent but lacks audience variants. Battlecards exist but are not regularly updated.
5Best-in-Class
Positioning doc cascades into all comms. Audience variants in place. CI is a funded function feeding sales, PMM, and product.

Your score

1.3

Category & Narrative Strategy

What good looks like: The company has made a deliberate, written choice about its category — creating a new one, redefining an existing one, or competing hard within one — and understands the cost and payoff of that choice. The category narrative is owned at the leadership level, not delegated to a content calendar, and it shows up consistently across PR, thought leadership, analyst relations, and product launches. Analysts are briefed on a regular rhythm and can accurately describe where the company sits; the narrative has been tested with real customers, not just admired internally. When the market shifts, the narrative is revisited deliberately rather than drifting one blog post at a time.

1Getting Started
No category point of view. Reactive PR and content. Analysts unaware of the company.
3Developing
Category language exists in marketing but inconsistently reinforced. Some analyst engagement.
5Best-in-Class
Clear category narrative owned by leadership, reflected across PR, content, analyst relations, and product launches.

Your score